Back To Search

Barramundi - U.S.

Lates calcarifer

Sometimes known as Asian Sea Bass, Giant Perch

This Species is Farm Raised

Summary

U.S. farmed Barramundi is raised in closed aquaculture systems, where water is recycled and very little waste is released into the environment. The waste that is released is heavily treated and can be used as fertilizer for agriculture. Native to tropical Australia and Asia, Barramundi are opportunistic predators of fish and crustaceans. In the U.S., farm-raised Barramundi are fed high energy pellets consisting of moderate levels of fish meal and oil.



CRITERIONPoints
Inherent Operational Risks3.50
Feed2.75
Pollution3.75
Risk to Other Species3.75
Ecological Effects3.50
Final Score 3.45
Color
Final ScoreColor
2.60 - 4.00
2.20 - 2.59
1.80 - 2.19
1.40 - 1.79
0.00 - 1.39

Inherent Operational Risks

Core Points (only one selection allowed)

General System Design: An aquaculture system's design is a good overall proxy measure for the likely effect of the operation on the environment. For example, open systems (e.g., net pens and net cages) are more likely to have pollution, disease, and escape issues than closed systems (e.g., recirculating tanks). With shellfish, which don't require supplemental food input, the more important question is whether they are harvested on or off of the bottom.

1.00This species is raised in a high risk system (e.g., net pens; net cages).

2.00This species is raised in a moderate risk system (e.g., most ponds; raceways; bottom culture of mollusks).

3.00This species is raised in a low risk system (e.g., re-circulating closed system; suspended culture of mollusks; zero-discharge ponds).

In the U.S. (and parts of Australia) Barramundi are farmed in re-circulating, closed systems (FOA 2008, Australis 2008). These systems involve biological and physical filtration, removing particulate matter such as faeces and uneaten food from the water. Clean filtered water can then be reused, with one U.S. Barramundi farm reusing the same water over 250 times before being replaced (Australis 2005). Filtering and recycling water greatly reduces any environmental impact. Re-circulatory systems also prevent the likelihood of fish escapes.

In Southeast Asia, Taiwan, and some parts of Australia, Barramundi are farmed in open ponds, or net pens in lakes or coastal marine areas. This farming method is considered high risk because of environmental concerns and the possibility of fish escapes. Open net pen farms are increasing in Southeast Asia to meet demand for export to the U.S. and Europe.

Although Barramundi farming systems or methods vary among countries, this ranking will focus on the re-circulatory, closed system used in the U.S. There is currently only one Barramundi farm operating in the U.S., located in Massachusetts.

Points of Adjustment (multiple selections allowed)
-0.25Species is raised at a high stocking density; OR there is a high density of sites in the geographic region, with evidence of environmental impact.

-0.25Operations do not incorporate best-available, cost-effective technology to reduce environmental impact.

-0.25There are no effective zoning or permitting practices for siting of facilities.

-0.25Government programs encourage expansion of high-impact systems.

+0.25Species is raised at a low stocking density OR there is a low density of sites in the geographic region, which results in minimal impact to the natural ecosystem.

Barramundi in the U.S. are farmed at moderate stocking densities, between 30-50 kg/m3 (Goldman 2008). In Australia, some Barramundi farms pump oxygen into the water to allow higher stocking densities. Although stocking density of U.S. farmed Barraumundi is moderate, there is a low number of farms (1) in the geographic region, thus points were added.

+0.25Operations incorporate innovative culture methods that limit environmental impacts (e.g., polyculture).

The use of high-tech re-circulatory systems, with biological and physical filtration, results in the farmed water being used and recycled for at least 250 times before being replaced (Australis 2005). Good filtration means that water released from the farm has very low levels of nutrients and organic compounds (Australis 2005). Waste material or effluent that is screened from the water is recycled and used as agricultural fertilizer (Australis 2005). The combination of these factors means that the farming operation used to grow Barramundi in the U.S. has minimal impact on the surrounding environment.

+0.25There are effective zoning or permitting practices for siting and operation of facilities (e.g., mandatory consideration of hydrographic characteristics; requirements for site rotation).

+0.25Government programs preferentially encourage the expansion of low-impact systems over high impact systems.


3.50Points for Inherent Operational Risks

Feed

Core Points (only one selection allowed)

Ecological Footprint of Feed: "Trash" fish, frequently used in developing countries, is an industry term used to refer to whole fish or fish parts fed to farmed fish without being processed into fish meal and fish oil. Twenty percent was selected as a cut-off because carnivorous species (e.g., salmon; eel; tuna; cobia; etc.) generally consume greater than twenty percent fish products (fishmeal, fish oil, or trash fish), while omnivorous or herbivorous species (e.g., catfish; tilapia; carps; etc.) consume less than twenty percent fish products.

1.00Typical aquaculture feed includes high levels of fishmeal, fish oil, or "trash" fish (i.e., >20% of the feed; e.g., salmonid feeds).

2.00Typical aquaculture feed includes moderate levels of fishmeal, fish oil, or "trash" fish (i.e., <20% of the feed; e.g., tilapia and catfish feeds).

Barramundi in the wild are opportunistic predators feeding mostly on fish and crustaceans such as prawns (Allsop et al. 2006). Farmed-raised Barramundi are fed a diet of high energy pellets, consisting of essential amino acids, vitamins, carbohydrates and minerals (Glencross 2006). In the U.S, the diet of farmed Barramundi contains approximately 20% fishmeal and 5% fish oil, with one-third of the content produced as a by-product of the Canadian Herring roe fishery (Goldman 2008). The remaining two-thirds consist of Peruvian Anchovy and Icelandic Capelin. All three fish species are at good to high levels of abundance.
Barramundi larvae are generally fed on a diet of rotifers and brine shrimp, which in turn are cultured with microalgae (FOA 2008). However, microdiets enriched with essential nutrients are becoming more common when rearing Barramundi larvae (FAO 2008).
Although approximately 20% of the feed for adult Barramundi is sourced from wild fish populations, a significant proportion is a by-product for a human food fishery (roe), thus a ranking of 2 was chosen.

3.00No feed is used (e.g., mollusks and seaweeds) or typical aquaculture feed includes no fishmeal, fish oil, or "trash" fish (e.g., paddlefish; filter-feeding carps).

Points of Adjustment (multiple selections allowed)
-0.25When fish products are used, the major sources score low on the Wild-Caught Fisheries Ranking System.

-0.25Feed contains greater than 10% of fish products and public or private sectors are not working to reduce fish content in feed.

-0.25Feed conversion ratio (FCR) is high (i.e., >2.0; e.g., eel).

-0.25Government policy promotes research, development and commercialization of carnivorous or other highly fishmeal-dependent species.

+0.25When fish products are used, the major sources score high on the Wild-Caught Fisheries Ranking System; OR the source is innovative and ecologically sound (e.g., fisheries byproducts); OR no feed is used.

Canadian Herring and Icelandic Capelin, two of three seafood species used in Barramundi feed, are both ranked green (i.e. high score) on Blue Ocean Institute's wild-caught ranking system (BOI 2008). Peruvian Anchovy has not yet been ranked by BOI. In addition, the Herring component in the feed is a by-product from the Canadian Herring roe fishery, thus reducing waste in a human food fishery.

+0.25Feed contains less than 10% of fish products OR public and private sectors are working to reduce the fish content in feed; OR no feed is used.

Research is currently examining ways to reduce the percent of fish products in farmed Barramundi diet, such as replacing fish meal with legumes or beans (Eusebio and Coloso 2000) or meat meal (Williams et al. 2003).

+0.25Feed conversion ratio (FCR) is low (i.e., <1.3; e.g., salmon); OR no feed is used.

The FCR in many foreign commercial Barramundi farms is 1.6-1.8:1, and maybe be higher in winter when fished are farmed in open systems (FAO 2008). In contrast, Barramundi farmed in the U.S. have a relatively low FCR of 1.1:1 (Goldman 2008), achieved through feeding studies and tight control of environmental conditions promoting efficient conversion of 'food to fish'.

+0.25Government policy promotes research, development and commercialization of herbivorous species or other species not highly dependent on fishmeal.


2.75Points for Feed

Pollution

Core Points (only one selection allowed)

Typical effluent treatment procedures:

1.00Effluent is not treated before discharge (e.g., salmon net pens).

2.00Effluent is partially treated before discharge (e.g., infrequently discharged effluent from catfish ponds).

3.00Effluent is substantially treated before discharge (e.g., recirculating shrimp systems; settling ponds; reconstructed wetlands); OR treatment is not necessary because supplemental feed is not used (e.g., molluscs or seaweeds).

Barramundi farmed in the U.S. are raised in closed, re-circulatory system, where all water is screened through biological and physical filters (Australis 2005). Water that is released is first cleaned to remove nutrient and organic compounds and treated with ozone to remove micro-organisms. In the U.S., effluent or fish manure produced from farming Barramundi can be used as fertilizer for local farms (Australis 2005).

Points of Adjustment (multiple selections allowed)
-0.25Operations have demonstrated negative impacts on water quality or sediment/benthic characteristics (e.g., elevated nutrient levels; algal blooms; altered benthic communities).

-0.25Pollutants (e.g., pesticides; parasiticides; antibiotics; plastic; nets; dead fish) are frequently discharged into the environment or otherwise not appropriately discarded.

-0.25Effluent regulations do not exist, are lax, or are poorly enforced, which allows for degradation of the aquatic environment.

-0.25Available technologies and practices to reduce or recycle waste (e.g., feed sensors; low-pollution feeds) are not used.

+0.25Operations generally improve water quality or sediment/benthic characteristics (e.g., oyster farms).

+0.25Chemicals (e.g., pesticides; parasiticides; antibiotics) are rarely or never used.

The one farming operation in the U.S. that cultures Barramundi does not add antibiotics or hormones (Australis 2008).

+0.25Robust water quality regulations exist (e.g., permits required; discharge caps; strong enforcement), and regular monitoring occurs.

Treated effluent is discharged under a permit issued by the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, which is part of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The discharged water is monitored weekly for suspended solids and biological oxygen demand, with the latter a good test to estimate the amount of micro-organisms in the water. A water quality report is submitted monthly to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Goldman 2008).

+0.25Innovative methods and practices to reduce or recycle wastes are used (e.g., integrated systems; effluent and solid wastes used as terrestrial fertilizer); OR innovative methods and practices are not needed because raising this species does not create waste.

Closed re-circulatory systems used to farm Barramundi in the U.S. promote the re-use of water, while fish effluent is recycled and used as agricultural fertilizer (Australis 2005).


3.75Points for Pollution

Risk to Other Species

Core Points (only one selection allowed)

Frequency and Impact of Escapes:

1.00Farmed species regularly or intermittently escape into the wild AND escapes are non-native to the area or otherwise pose a risk to native populations or ecosystems (e.g., most non-native fish raised in outdoor facilities).

2.00Escape frequency is not known OR farmed species is native to the area where it is raised and poses minimal risk to native populations or ecosystems (e.g., channel catfish in the US; most native mollusks).

3.00Farmed species never (or virtually never) escape to the wild (e.g., species is raised in bio-secure facilities).

Barramundi is a tropical species that lives in water temperatures from 20 to 28 oC (68-82 oF) (Fishbase 2008). In the U.S., Barramundi are farmed in Massachusetts, where water temperatures in summer are too cold for any escaped Barramundi to survive. In addition, the closed system used for farming Barramundi prevents escapes.

Points of Adjustment (multiple selections allowed)
-0.25This farmed species has been known to survive in the surrounding ecosystem if it escapes; OR would likely survive given its physiological requirements.

-0.25This farmed species is known or is likely to compete with wild species for food or habitat if it escapes; OR this species is known or is likely to compromise the genetic integrity of the wild species (e.g., through spawning disruption, genetic introgression or establishment of feral stocks) if it escapes.

-0.25This farmed species is known or is likely to amplify and transmit disease or parasites to wild populations (e.g., infectious salmon anemia or sea lice infestations) if it escapes.

-0.25Regulatory authorities are not adequately addressing the risks of escape or spread of disease associated with farming this species.

+0.25Rescore This farmed species has not been known to survive in the surrounding ecosystem if it escapes; OR would not likely survive given its physiological requirements; OR farmed species is a native mollusc.

If Barramundi, which are a tropical warm-water species, did escape, they would not survive due to the cold water in the location (Massachusetts) where they are farmed.

+0.25Operations employ management protocols and techniques to limit the ecological impacts of escaped farmed fish (e.g., triploidy; sterilization); OR it's unlikely that escaped individuals will either compete with wild species for resources, or compromise the genetic integrity of wild species.

The closed system used to farm Barramundi in the U.S. (FOA 2008) prevents fish escapes.

+0.25Operations employ effective disease and parasite management protocols (e.g., fallowing of pens; retaining water when disease outbreak occurs); OR incidence of disease or risk of retransmitting disease is low.

A closed system where waste water is passed through filters including an ozone treatment to kill micro-organisms before release (Australis 2005) reduces the chance of diseases escaping from the farm to the local environment.

+0.25Regulatory authorities are addressing the risks of escape and spread of disease associated with farming this species.


3.75Points for Risk to Other Species

Ecological Effects

Core Points (only one selection allowed)

Ecological sensitivity of site used for operations:

1.00Operations are generally located in areas of high ecological sensitivity (e.g., coastal wetlands; mangroves).

2.00Operations are generally located in areas of moderate ecological sensitivity (e.g., coastal and nearshore waters; rocky intertidal or subtidal zones; river or stream shorelines).

3.00Operations are generally located in areas of low ecological sensitivity (e.g., land that is less susceptible to degradation such as land formerly used for agriculture or land previously developed).

The one operation in the U.S. commercially farming Barramundi is located in a small industrial park in Turner Falls, Massachusetts. Most of the land for the farming facility was previously developed (Goldman 2008); the remaining land was originally pine forest which is of low ecological sensitivity.

Points of Adjustment (multiple selections allowed)
-0.25Farming this species causes substantial damage to surrounding habitat, ecosystem or other resources (e.g., groundwater depletion; stream diversion; saltwater intrusion; soil salinization; loss of habitat for juvenile fish; loss of flood control; dredging hard bottoms; etc.).

-0.25Harmful or lethal predator deterrents are used (e.g., bird/seal shootings; acoustic deterrent devices); OR operation otherwise harms wildlife (e.g., dolphin/seal entanglement; disrupting migration routes; bird/animal shooting).

-0.25If seed is collected from wild sources, the intensity of collection is high enough to result in depletion of brood stock, wild juveniles, or associated non-target organisms (e.g., collection of postlarvae shrimp).

-0.25Government policy encourages aquaculture operations to locate or expand in areas of high ecological sensitivity.

+0.25Operations enhance habitat structure or function (e.g., constructed wetlands).

+0.25Predator deterrents are not used OR predator deterrents are used but are not harmful or lethal (e.g., predator exclusion nets), AND operation does not otherwise harm wildlife.

Barramundi farmed in the U.S. are grown in closed systems so there is no risk of predation, thus no predator deterrents are needed.

+0.25Seed comes predominantly from hatcheries or on-farm sites (e.g., seed for trout); OR if seed is collected from the wild, it does not deplete brood stock, wild juveniles, or associated non-target organisms (e.g., collection of oyster or mussel spat).

Juvenile Barramundi were initially imported from Australia, where they are cultured in hatcheries (FAO 2008). These imported Barramundi are certified disease-free by Australian fish health authorities (Australis 2005). Since January 2007, an on-site hatchery has been supplying juvenile Barramundi for grow-out (Goldman 2008).

+0.25Government policy encourages the growth of aquaculture operations in areas of low ecological sensitivity; OR protects sensitive habitats from aquaculture operations (e.g., prohibitions on cutting mangroves).


3.50Points for Ecological Effects

Reference

Allsop Q, de Lestang P, Griffin R and White G (2006) Barramundi ¨C your questions answered. Fishnote 27. Available at: www.nt.gov.au/dpifm

Australis (2005) Barramundi: background on environmental and human health issues. Australis Aquaculture, LLC report.
Australis (2008) U.S. Farmed Barramundi. Available at: http://www.thebetterfish.com/

Eusebio PS and Coloso RM (2000) Nutritional evaluation of various plant protein sources in diets for Asian sea bass Lates calcarifer. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 16(2): 56-60.

Fishbase (2008) Barramundi, Lates calcarifer. Available at: http://fishbase.com/Summary/SpeciesSummary.php?id=346

Fishwelfare (2005) Stocking density. Available at: http://www.fishwelfare.net/projects/stocking-density.php

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2008) Barramundi. Available at: http://www.fao.org/fishery/culturedspecies/Lates_calcarifer/en

Glencross B (2006) The nutritional management of barramundi, Lates calcarifer - a review. Aquaculture Nutrition 12:291-309.

Goldman J (2008) Managing Director of Australis Aquaculture. Personal communication.

Williams KC, Barlow CG, Rodgers LJ and Ruscoe I (2003) Potential of meat meal to replace fish meal in extruded dry diets for barramundi, Lates calcarifer (Bloch). 1. Growth performance. Aquaculture Research 34: 23-32.

Fish Key

Species is relatively abundant, and fishing/farming methods cause little damage to habitat and other wildlife.
Species has medium to high levels of abundance, or fishing/farming methods cause some damage to the environment.
Some problems exist with this species' status or catch/farming methods, or information is insufficient for evaluating.
Species abundance is generally low, or fishing/farming methods typically have large environmental impact.
Species has a combination of problems such as overfishing, high bycatch, and poor management; or farming methods have serious environmental impacts.
A fishery targeting this species has been certified as sustainable and well managed to the Marine Stewardship Council's environmental standard. Learn more at www.msc.org.
These fish contain levels of mercury or PCBs that may pose a health risk to adults and children. Please refer to http://www.edf.org/seafood for more details.