Atlantic Halibut/Copyright © Charlotte Knox
Atlantic Halibut/Copyright © Charlotte Knox

Atlantic Halibut

Hippoglossus hippoglossus

This species is wild-caught.

Summary

Fishers use bottom longlines and groundfish trawls to catch Atlantic Halibut. Long-lived and slow to mature, this fish is vulnerable to fishing pressure. Like Atlantic Cod, Atlantic Halibut in U.S. and Canadian waters crashed in the 20th century due to overfishing and remain depleted today.

Criterion Points
Life History 1.00
Abundance 0.50
Habitat Quality and Fishing Gear Impacts 2.00
Management 0.50
Bycatch 2.25
Final Score (average of criteria) 1.25
Color
Final Score Color
2.60 - 4.00
2.20 - 2.59
1.80 - 2.19
1.40 - 1.79
0.00 - 1.39

Last updated September 27, 2007.

Life History

Core Points (only one selection allowed)

If a value for intrinsic rate of increase (‘r’) is known, assign the score below based on this value. If no r-value is available, assign the score below for the correct age at 50% maturity for females if specified, or for the correct value of growth rate ('k'). If no estimates of r, age at 50% maturity, or k are available, assign the score below based on maximum age.

1.00
Intrinsic rate of increase <0.05; OR age at 50% maturity >10 years; OR growth rate <0.15; OR maximum age >30 years.

Intrinsic rate of increase is unknown. Age at sexual maturity is 10 to 12 years for females, and 7 to 11 years for males (DFO 2003). Once they reach maturity, males grow slower than females, so growth rate of the species is varied (Archambault, pers. comm., 2004). Maximum age is over 50 years (NAFC 1999).

2.00
Intrinsic rate of increase = 0.05-0.15; OR age at 50% maturity = 5-10 years; OR a growth rate = 0.16–0.30; OR maximum age = 11-30 years.
3.00
Intrinsic rate of increase >0.16; OR age at 50% maturity = 1-5 years; OR growth rate >0.30; OR maximum age <11 years.

Points of Adjustment (multiple selections allowed)

-0.25
Species has special behaviors that make it especially vulnerable to fishing pressure (e.g., spawning aggregations; site fidelity; segregation by sex; migratory bottlenecks; unusual attraction to gear; etc.).

Atlantic Halibut spawn annually in groups on slopes of the continental shelf and the offshore banks of the Western Atlantic. Spawning occurs in deep water over mud or clay bottom off the coast of Norway, and has been reported over rough or rocky bottom in the Western Atlantic (NOAA 1999). Juvenile Atlantic Halibut remain in well-defined nursery grounds for about 90 days (NOAA 1999). Larger animals may not disperse widely and may return annually to spawning grounds, although this is not well-documented (NOAA 1999; Brodziak, pers. comm., 2004).

There is limited support, however, for substantial spawning aggregations, which may be in part due to low density, so we chose not to subtract points here (Brodziak, pers. comm., 2004).

-0.25
Species has a strategy for sexual development that makes it especially vulnerable to fishing pressure (e.g., age at 50% maturity >20 years; sequential hermaphrodites; extremely low fecundity).
-0.25
Species has a small or restricted range (e.g., endemism; numerous evolutionarily significant units; restricted to one coastline; e.g., American lobster; striped bass; endemic reef fishes).

Atlantic Halibut are found on both sides of the North Atlantic and in some parts of the Arctic Ocean (NOAA 1999). They are distributed from Disko Bay, Greenland to Long Island, and have been found as far south as Virginia (NOAA 1999; Zwanenburg et al. 2003). In the Eastern Atlantic, they range from the Bay of Biscay to the Barents Sea and eastern Greenland (Fishbase 2004). We consider this to be a medium size range.

-0.25
Species exhibits high natural population variability driven by broad–scale environmental change (e.g., El Nino; decadal oscillations).
+0.25
Species does not have special behaviors that increase ease or population consequences of capture OR has special behaviors that make it less vulnerable to fishing pressure (e.g., species is widely dispersed during spawning).
+0.25
Species has a strategy for sexual development that makes it especially resilient to fishing pressure (e.g., age at 50% maturity <1 year; extremely high fecundity).
+0.25
Species is distributed over a very wide range (e.g., throughout an entire hemisphere or ocean basin; e.g., swordfish; tuna; Patagonian toothfish).
+0.25
Species does not exhibit high natural population variability driven by broad-scale environmental change (e.g., El Nino; decadal oscillations).
1.00
Points for Life History

Abundance

Core Points (only one selection allowed)

Compared to natural or un-fished level, the species population is:

1.00
Low: Abundance or biomass is <75% of BMSY or similar proxy (e.g., spawning potential ratio).

Abundance of Atlantic Halibut is low throughout its range. The Scotian Shelf and Southern Grand Banks and Gulf of St. Lawrence populations in Canadian waters are stable at very low levels of abundance compared to levels in the early 20th century (Zwanenburg et al. 2003; DFO 2004).

In U.S. waters, biomass in the Gulf of Maine and Georges Bank is assessed through both fishery dependent and independent surveys. In 2001, population biomass was estimated at 232 metric tons (mt), which is 9% of BTHRESHOLD and 4% of BMSY. (GARM 2002).

Some researchers believe biomass is at such critically low levels that Atlantic Halibut could go extinct (Krisstensson 2002).

2.00
Medium: Abundance or biomass is 75–125% of BMSY or similar proxy; OR population is approaching or recovering from an overfished condition; OR adequate information on abundance or biomass is not available.
3.00
High: Abundance or biomass is >125% of BMSY or similar proxy.

Points of Adjustment (multiple selections allowed)

-0.25
The population is declining over a generational time scale (as indicated by biomass estimates or standardized CPUE).

Atlantic Halibut in Canadian waters suffered intensive fishing pressure by mostly American fishers in the first half of the 20th century. Since then, their populations have not recovered, and Atlantic Halibut remain at very low levels of abundance (Zwanenburg et al. 2003; DFO 2004).

Recruitment to the Scotian Shelf and Southern Grand Banks population has been low since 1993 and declined further in 2002, but the numbers of pre-recruits increased from 1998-2001 (Zwanenburg et al. 2003). Likewise, increases in the number of small halibut in the Gulf of St. Lawrence population have been identified and may indicate that recruitment increased in the 1990s (DFO 2004).

Atlantic Halibut have shown no recovery in U.S. waters, and stock assessment biologists do not expect the population to rebuild in the near future (GARM 2002). Also, little or no recovery of Atlantic Halibut populations has been seen in Greenland, Iceland, or Norway (EU Commission 2003).

-0.25
Age, size or sex distribution is skewed relative to the natural condition (e.g., truncated size/age structure or anomalous sex distribution).
-0.25
Species is listed as “overfished” OR species is listed as “depleted”, “endangered”, or “threatened” by recognized national or international bodies.

The IUCN classifies Atlantic Halibut as Endangered—facing a very high risk of extinction in the wild in the near future—on the IUCN Red List by virtue of population reduction of at least 50% caused by exploitation (IUCN 2004). The species is listed as "overfished" in the U.S (NMFS 2003).

-0.25
Current levels of abundance are likely to jeopardize the availability of food for other species or cause substantial change in the structure of the associated food web.
+0.25
The population is increasing over a generational time scale (as indicated by biomass estimates or standardized CPUE).
+0.25
Age, size or sex distribution is functionally normal.
+0.25
Species is close to virgin biomass.
+0.25
Current levels of abundance provide adequate food for other predators or are not known to affect the structure of the associated food web.
0.50
Points for Abundance

Habitat Quality and Fishing Gear Impacts

Core Points (only one selection allowed)

Select the option that most accurately describes the effect of the fishing method upon the habitat that it affects.

1.00
The fishing method causes great damage to physical and biogenic habitats (e.g., cyanide; blasting; bottom trawling; dredging).
2.00
The fishing method does moderate damage to physical and biogenic habitats (e.g., bottom gillnets; traps and pots; bottom longlines).

In Canada, where most of the Atlantic Halibut in U.S. markets is caught, fishers use bottom longlines to catch them. In the U.S. the only fishery for Atlantic halibut is an experimental fishery in the Gulf of Maine that uses longlines and tub trawls (NOAA 2003). We consider bottom longlines to be less damaging than bottom trawling, but not as habitat friendly as pelagic longlines.

3.00
The fishing method does little damage to physical or biogenic habitats (e.g., hand picking; hand raking; hook and line; pelagic long lines; mid-water trawl or gillnet; purse seines).

Points of Adjustment (multiple selections allowed)

-0.25
Habitat for this species is so compromised from non-fishery impacts that the ability of the habitat to support this species is substantially reduced (e.g., dams; pollution; coastal development).
-0.25
Critical habitat areas (e.g., spawning areas) for this species are not protected by management using time/area closures, marine reserves, etc.
-0.25
No efforts are being made to minimize damage from existing gear types OR new or modified gear is increasing habitat damage (e.g., fitting trawls with roller rigs or rockhopping gear; more robust gear for deep-sea fisheries).
-0.25
If gear impacts are substantial, resilience of affected habitats is very slow (e.g., deep water corals; rocky bottoms).
+0.25
Habitat for this species remains robust and viable and is capable of supporting this species.
+0.25
Critical habitat areas (e.g., spawning areas) for this species are protected by management using time/area closures, marine reserves, etc.
+0.25
Gear innovations are being implemented over a majority of the fishing area to minimize damage from gear types OR no innovations necessary because gear effects are minimal.
+0.25
If gear impacts are substantial, resilience of affected habitats is fast (e.g., mud or sandy bottoms) OR gear effects are minimal.
2.00
Points for Habitat Quality and Fishing Gear Impacts

Management

Core Points (only one selection allowed)

Select the option that most accurately describes the current management of the fisheries of this species.

1.00
Regulations are ineffective (e.g., illegal fishing or overfishing is occurring) OR the fishery is unregulated (i.e., no control rules are in effect).

In Canada, where the vast majority of Atlantic Halibut sold in the U.S. are caught, management is divided between two management units: the Gulf of St. Lawrence and the Scotian Shelf and Southern Grand Banks. Landings in the Gulf of St. Lawrence have not met the Total Allowable Catch (TAC) limit in the last 5 years. In 1999, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) increased the TAC for the Scotian Shelf and Southern Grand Banks population from 850 metric tons (mt) to 1150 mt. Catch limits are not well-enforced: between 1997 and 2003, landings exceeded the TAC five times (Zwanenburg et al. 2003).

Also, the minimum size limit does not sufficiently protect spawning females, and the majority of commercial catches includes fish smaller than the age at which 50% of females reach maturity (DFO 2004). This is a major liability for the future of the Atlantic Halibut fisheries in Canadian waters.

The Gulf of Maine and Georges Bank population is managed by the New England Fishery Management Council. This population is grossly overfished and is not expected to rebuild in the near future. The New England Fishery Management Council has discussed developing a recovery plan, but none exists. Currently there is a very low limit on the number of Atlantic Halibut that may be taken in the recreational fishery, and Atlantic Halibut are allowed only as bycatch in the groundfish fisheries (GARM 2002).

In European waters, the Atlantic Halibut fishery is managed with gear limitations, annual quotas, minimum size restrictions and area closures. There is a TAC on Atlantic Halibut, as well as a bycatch cap. If bycatch of Atlantic Halibut is reached in directed fisheries for other species, the bycatch cap will close the directed fishery (EC 2002).

A low score of 1.00 point was awarded here to account for the poor enforcement of catch limits in Canadian waters, which supply the majority of Atlantic Halibut to U.S. waters. Despite existent management schemes, the poor status of Atlantic Halibut throughout its range indicates that the species is not being managed for sustainability.

2.00
Management measures are in place over a major portion over the species’ range but implementation has not met conservation goals OR management measures are in place but have not been in place long enough to determine if they are likely to achieve conservation and sustainability goals.
3.00
Substantial management measures are in place over a large portion of the species range and have demonstrated success in achieving conservation and sustainability goals.

Points of Adjustment (multiple selections allowed)

-0.25
There is inadequate scientific monitoring of stock status, catch or fishing effort.

Although catches are monitored and stock assessments are performed in both Canadian and U.S. waters, biological research of Atlantic Halibut is lacking. The Department of Fisheries and Oceans in Canada monitors Atlantic Halibut with research vessel and longline surveys, the latter of which provides the best data. These surveys generally take place when the fish are not spawning and do not collect important data about the maturation process of Atlantic Halibut. The minimum size limit (81 cm) may not be high enough to protect spawning females (Zwanenburg 2003; Archambault, pers. comm., 2004), but there are limited resources available to collect the data needed to assess this (Archambault, pers. comm., 2004). Also, the high variability in abundance estimates among groundfish surveys in the Gulf of St. Lawrence population is cause for concern (DFO 2004).

-0.25
Management does not explicitly address fishery effects on habitat, food webs, and ecosystems.
-0.25
This species is overfished and no recovery plan or an ineffective recovery plan is in place.

In Canada, Atlantic Halibut is at very low levels of abundance compared to its population size in the early 1900s (Zwanenburg et al. 2003; DFO 2004). It is not designated as overfished, however, and no recovery plan is in place.

Atlantic Halibut is classified as overfished in the U.S., because population biomass is below the population size threshold (NFMS 2003). The New England Fishery Management Council has discussed developing a recovery plan, but none exists.

-0.25
Management has failed to reduce excess capacity in this fishery or implements subsidies that result in excess capacity in this fishery.
+0.25
There is adequate scientific monitoring, analysis and interpretation of stock status, catch and fishing effort.
+0.25
Management explicitly and effectively addresses fishery effects on habitat, food webs, and ecosystems.
+0.25
This species is overfished and there is a recovery plan (including benchmarks, timetables and methods to evaluate success) in place that is showing signs of success OR recovery plan is not needed.
+0.25
Management has taken action to control excess capacity or reduce subsidies that result in excess capacity OR no measures are necessary because fishery is not overcapitalized.
0.50
Points for Management

Bycatch

Core Points (only one selection allowed)

Select the option that most accurately describes the current level of bycatch and the consequences that result from fishing this species.

The term, "bycatch” used in this document excludes incidental catch of a species for which an adequate management framework exists.

The terms, “endangered, threatened, or protected,” used in this document refer to species status that is determined by national legislation such as the U.S. Endangered Species Act, the U.S. Marine Mammal Protection Act (or another nation's equivalent), the IUCN Red List, or a credible scientific body such as the American Fisheries Society.

1.00
Bycatch in this fishery is high (>100% of targeted landings), OR regularly includes a “threatened, endangered or protected species.”
2.00
Bycatch in this fishery is moderate (10-99% of targeted landings) AND does not regularly include “threatened, endangered or protected species” OR level of bycatch is unknown.

Quantitative estimates of bycatch are not available. Most directed fisheries for Atlantic Halibut are limited, and Atlantic Halibut is generally caught incidentally in generalized groundfish fisheries, so it is difficult to assess this issue (Zwanenburg et al. 2003).

White Hake, Cusk, Atlantic Cod, Dogfish, and several other species are caught in association with Atlantic Halibut. Incidental capture of these species is estimated to be high, between 46 and 69% of the catch (Zwanenburg et al. 2003). It is unknown to what degree these other species are landed or discarded.

In the U.S., Atlantic Halibut is primarily captured incidentally in other groundfish fisheries.

3.00
Bycatch in this fishery is low (<10% of targeted landings) and does not regularly include "threatened, endangered or protected species."

Points of Adjustment (multiple selections allowed)

-0.25
Bycatch in this fishery is a contributing factor to the decline of “threatened, endangered, or protected species" and no effective measures are being taken to reduce it.
-0.25
Bycatch of targeted or non-targeted species (e.g., undersize individuals) in this fishery is high and no measures are being taken to reduce it.
-0.25
Bycatch of this species (e.g., undersize individuals) in other fisheries is high OR bycatch of this species in other fisheries inhibits its recovery, and no measures are being taken to reduce it.
-0.25
The continued removal of the bycatch species contributes to its decline.
+0.25
Measures taken over a major portion of the species range have been shown to reduce bycatch of “threatened, endangered, or protected species” or bycatch rates are no longer deemed to affect the abundance of the “protected” bycatch species OR no measures needed because fishery is highly selective (e.g., harpoon; spear).
+0.25
There is bycatch of targeted (e.g., undersize individuals) or non-targeted species in this fishery and measures (e.g., gear modifications) have been implemented that have been shown to reduce bycatch over a large portion of the species range OR no measures are needed because fishery is highly selective (e.g., harpoon; spear).
+0.25
Bycatch of this species in other fisheries is low OR bycatch of this species in other fisheries inhibits its recovery, but effective measures are being taken to reduce it over a large portion of the range.

Halibut are taken as bycatch in trawl fisheries for groundfish in Canada and the U.S. Managers are concerned that the bycatch of immature halibut in these fisheries is inhibiting recovery of the species. In Canada, shrimp trawlers are now using bycatch reduction devices for groundfish, called Nordmore grates (DFO 2004). Increases in the abundance of small Atlantic Halibut in the Gulf of St. Lawrence in recent years is likely the result of moratoria on Cod and Redfish trawling operations and the adoption of Nordmore grates by shrimpers (Archambault, pers. comm., 2004; DFO 2004).

+0.25
The continued removal of the bycatch species in the targeted fishery has had or will likely have little or no impact on populations of the bycatch species OR there are no significant bycatch concerns because the fishery is highly selective (e.g., harpoon; spear).
2.25
Points for Bycatch

References

Archambault, D. 12/7/2004. Maurice Lamontagne Institute, Quebec. Personal communication.

Brodziak, J. 10/12/04. Northeast Fisheries Science Center. Personal communication.

Commission of the European Communities (EC). 2003. Communication from the Commission (COM(2003)344) of 11.06.2003 on compliance with the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy - "Compliance work plan and Scoreboard".

EC. 2002. Communication from the Commission on the reform of the common fisheries policy. Roadmap (COM(2002) 181 final of 28.5.2002)

EC. 2002. Council Regulation fixing for 2003 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where limitations in catch are required. Brussels, 11.12.2002 COM(2002) 727.

Department of Fisheries & Oceans. 2004. Stock Status Report 2004/013: Atlantic Halibut of the Gulf of St. Lawrence- Update (2003). Available at: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas/Csas/English/Publications/Stock_Report_e.htm.

Division of Fisheries & Oceans. 2003. Atlantic halibut. Underwater World. http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/zone/underwater_sous-marin/ahalibut/ahalibut-fletan_e.htm

Fishbase. 11/29/2004. Species Summary for Hippoglossus hippoglossus. Available at: http://www.fishbase.org/Summary/SpeciesSummary.cfm?genusname=Hippoglossus&speciesname=hippoglossus.

Groundfish Assessment Review Meeting (GARM). 2002. Assessment of 20 Northeast Groundfish Stocks through 2001. Available at: http://www.nefsc.noaa.gov/nefsc/publications/crd/crd0216/.

Kristinsson, K. & R.A. Myers. 2002. “Is Atlantic halibut going extinct?” Society for Conservation Biology 16th Annual Meeting, July 14-July 19 2002, co-hosted by DICE and the British Ecological Society.

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 2003. Report to Congress: The Status of U.S. Fisheries. Available at: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/statusoffisheries/statusostocks03/Report_Text.pdf.

North Atlantic Fisheries College. 1999. “The Atlantic Halibut: A Potential Species for Fish Farming in Shetland.” Fisheries Info Note No. 2. January 1999. Port Arthur, Shetland, UK.

NOAA. 2003. Proposed rule, Notification of a proposal for experimental fishing permits. 68 Fed. Reg. 19180. April 18, 2003.

NOAA. 1999. Essential Fish Habitat Source Document:Atlantic Halibut, Hippoglossus hippoglossus, Life History and Habitat Characteristics, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Northeast Region. September 1999. NOAA Tech Mem NMFS-NE-125.

World Conservation Union (IUCN). 12/7/2004. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Available at: http://www.redlist.org/.

Zwanenburg, K., S. Wilson, R. Branton, and P. Brien. 2003. Halibut on the Scotian Shelf and Southern Grand Banks - Current Estimates of Population Status. Available at: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas/Csas/English/Research_Years/2003/2003_046_E.htm.

BLUE OCEAN INSTITUTE

34 Muttontown Lane, PO Box 250, East Norwich, NY 11732 • 1-877-BOI-SEAS • seafood@blueocean.org