American Oyster (left and center) and Pacific Oyster (right)
American Oyster (left and center) and Pacific Oyster (right)

Pacific Oyster (farmed)

Crassostrea gigas

Sometimes known as Giant Oyster, Giant Pacific Oyster, Gigas, Immigrant Oyster, Japanese Oyster, Magaki or Miyagi Oyster.

This species is farm-raised.

Summary

Pacific Oysters are an introduced species on the U.S. west coast. However, populations have been established for a long time, and wild beds and farms help restore the ecological functions lost when the native Olympia Oyster populations were decimated by pollution and overfishing. Like other bivalves, Pacific Oysters filter feed, thereby removing nutrients and improving water quality.

Criterion Points
Inherent Operational Risks 2.00
Feed 3.75
Pollution 3.50
Risk to Other Species 2.00
Ecological Effects 2.75
Final Score (average of criteria) 2.80
Color
Final Score Color
2.60 - 4.00
2.20 - 2.59
1.80 - 2.19
1.40 - 1.79
0.00 - 1.39

Last updated October 27, 2004.

Inherent Operational Risks

Core Points (only one selection allowed)

General System Design:

An aquaculture system's design is a good overall proxy measure for the likely effect of the operation on the environment. For example, open systems (e.g., net pens and net cages) are more likely to have pollution, disease, and escape issues than closed systems (e.g., recirculating tanks). With shellfish, which don’t require supplemental food input, the more important question is whether they are harvested on or off of the bottom.

1.00
This species is raised in a high risk system (e.g., net pens; net cages).
2.00
This species is raised in a moderate risk system (e.g., most ponds; raceways; bottom culture of mollusks).

Pacific Oysters are cultivated on the west coasts of the United States and Canada, as well as in Japan, South Korea, and China. The Pacific Coast Shellfish Growers Association (PCSGA 2000) reports production of 42,140 mt of oysters in Washington, Oregon, Alaska and California. The vast majority of these are Pacific Oysters. About 82% of oyster production was in Washington, 11% in California, 6% in Oregon and less than 1% in Alaska.

NMFS does not report imports of oysters at the species level. Imports of "oysters" come from China (817 mt), South Korea (358 mt), Canada (119 mt), and lesser amounts from New Zealand and Japan. These nations are producing mostly Pacific Oysters. The extent to which the NMFS data include farm-raised oysters is unclear.

All oyster farms on the west coast use a combination of on-bottom and suspension methods to farm oysters. On bottom culture is currently the most common method for farming Pacific Oysters in the U.S. The suspension cultures may be longline or racks (Downery, pers. comm. 2004).

In Asia, most of the Pacific Oysters are raised in suspension culture systems. Japanese growers generally use 10m x 20m rafts that are constructed from bamboo. In China, racks are the most common suspension system. There is some bottom culture in China, in which cement bars are used to collect spat and grow out oysters. However, bottom culture does not contribute a significant portion of the oysters from China (Matthiessen 2001).

Although a variety of methods are used to culture Pacific Oysters, most of the Pacific Oysters in the U.S. market were raised in bottom cultures, so we award a score of 2 for this criterion.

3.00
This species is raised in a low risk system (e.g., re-circulating closed system; suspended culture of mollusks; zero-discharge ponds).

Points of Adjustment (multiple selections allowed)

-0.25
Species is raised at a high stocking density; OR there is a high density of sites in the geographic region, with evidence of environmental impact.

There are serious issues with high stocking densities in South Korea, Japan, and presumably China. For example, in the Hiroshima Bay, Japan, intensive cultivation of Pacific Oysters has caused oxygen levels to decrease to harmful levels, leading to increased mortality (Matthiessen 2001). However, only a small amount of the oysters available in the U.S. are coming from China, so we do not subtract for this criterion.

-0.25
Operations do not incorporate best-available, cost-effective technology to reduce environmental impact.
-0.25
There are no effective zoning or permitting practices for siting of facilities.
-0.25
Government programs encourage expansion of high-impact systems.
+0.25
Species is raised at a low stocking density OR there is a low density of sites in the geographic region, which results in minimal impact to the natural ecosystem.
+0.25
Operations incorporate innovative culture methods that limit environmental impacts (e.g., polyculture).
+0.25
There are effective zoning or permitting practices for siting and operation of facilities (e.g., mandatory consideration of hydrographic characteristics; requirements for site rotation).

Washington, Oregon, California, Alaska and British Columbia all have licensing controls for leasing land from the state/province. In Washington, most tidelands are privately owned, but aquatic farms must be registered through the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. All states’ shellfish farms are certified through a registered Shellfish Authority, which is usually the state's department of health or agriculture. Depending upon culture operations, shellfish farms may require various shoreline development or use permits through local county ordinances. Most shellfish aquaculture activities are permitted through the Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit 4 (Downey 2004). It is unclear what the permitting practices are in South Korea, Japan and China, so we neither add nor subtract points for this factor.

+0.25
Government programs preferentially encourage the expansion of low-impact systems over high impact systems.
2.00
Points for Inherent Operational Risks

Feed

Core Points (only one selection allowed)

Ecological Footprint of Feed:

"Trash" fish, frequently used in developing countries, is an industry term used to refer to whole fish or fish parts fed to farmed fish without being processed into fish meal and fish oil.

Twenty percent was selected as a cut-off because carnivorous species (e.g., salmon; eel; tuna; cobia; etc.) generally consume greater than twenty percent fish products (fishmeal, fish oil, or trash fish), while omnivorous or herbivorous species (e.g., catfish; tilapia; carps; etc.) consume less than twenty percent fish products.

1.00
Typical aquaculture feed includes high levels of fishmeal, fish oil, or "trash" fish (i.e., >20% of the feed; e.g., salmonid feeds).
2.00
Typical aquaculture feed includes moderate levels of fishmeal, fish oil, or "trash" fish (i.e., <20% of the feed; e.g., tilapia and catfish feeds).
3.00
No feed is used (e.g., mollusks and seaweeds) or typical aquaculture feed includes no fishmeal, fish oil, or "trash" fish (e.g., paddlefish; filter-feeding carps).

No feed is used to farm Pacific Oysters, as they are filter-feeders, and get their nutrients from algae and other plankton in the water column (Matthiessen 2001).

Points of Adjustment (multiple selections allowed)

-0.25
When fish products are used, the major sources score low on the Wild-Caught Fisheries Ranking System.
-0.25
Feed contains greater than 10% of fish products and public or private sectors are not working to reduce fish content in feed.
-0.25
Feed conversion ratio (FCR) is high (i.e., >2.0; e.g., eel).
-0.25
Government policy promotes research, development and commercialization of carnivorous or other highly fishmeal-dependent species.
+0.25
When fish products are used, the major sources score high on the Wild-Caught Fisheries Ranking System; OR the source is innovative and ecologically sound (e.g., fisheries byproducts); OR no feed is used.

No feed is used (Matthiessen 2001).

+0.25
Feed contains less than 10% of fish products OR public and private sectors are working to reduce the fish content in feed; OR no feed is used.

No feed is used (Matthiessen 2001).

+0.25
Feed conversion ratio (FCR) is low (i.e., <1.3; e.g., salmon); OR no feed is used.

No feed is used (Matthiessen 2001).

+0.25
Government policy promotes research, development and commercialization of herbivorous species or other species not highly dependent on fishmeal.
3.75
Points for Feed

Pollution

Core Points (only one selection allowed)

Typical effluent treatment procedures:

1.00
Effluent is not treated before discharge (e.g., salmon net pens).
2.00
Effluent is partially treated before discharge (e.g., infrequently discharged effluent from catfish ponds).
3.00
Effluent is substantially treated before discharge (e.g., recirculating shrimp systems; settling ponds; reconstructed wetlands); OR treatment is not necessary because supplemental feed is not used (e.g., molluscs or seaweeds).

Treatment of effluent is not necessary because supplemental feed is not used to farm Pacific Oysters (Matthiessen 2001).

Points of Adjustment (multiple selections allowed)

-0.25
Operations have demonstrated negative impacts on water quality or sediment/benthic characteristics (e.g., elevated nutrient levels; algal blooms; altered benthic communities).
-0.25
Pollutants (e.g., pesticides; parasiticides; antibiotics; plastic; nets; dead fish) are frequently discharged into the environment or otherwise not appropriately discarded.

Chemicals are not generally used on oysters, however some may be used on oyster beds. For example, oyster farmers in Willapa Bay and Grays Harbor in Washington state may apply the pesticide Sevin (Carbaryl) to control burrowing shrimp. This practice is highly contentious as other organisms may be harmed (Johnson 2001). The use of Sevin is being phased out, and its use will be extinguished by 2012. As of yet, there are no feasible alternatives for farmers to control populations of the devastating burrowing shrimp.

Another chemical, "Habitat," is used to control the invasive Spartina plant, which has been turning tidelands into Spartina meadowlands. The use of Habitat has been supported by the Audubon Society and other conservation groups.

Practices in South Korea, China, and Japan are uncertain.

-0.25
Effluent regulations do not exist, are lax, or are poorly enforced, which allows for degradation of the aquatic environment.
-0.25
Available technologies and practices to reduce or recycle waste (e.g., feed sensors; low-pollution feeds) are not used.
+0.25
Operations generally improve water quality or sediment/benthic characteristics (e.g., oyster farms).

Although very dense farms in China have been shown to deplete oxygen from the water, most Pacific Oysters in the U.S. come from the west coast, where farmers will lower density to allow maximum growth rates. Generally, oysters improve water quality by filtering out algae and other plankton, thereby reducing levels of nitrogen, phosphorous and other nutrients (Downey, pers. comm., 2004).

+0.25
Chemicals (e.g., pesticides; parasiticides; antibiotics) are rarely or never used.
+0.25
Robust water quality regulations exist (e.g., permits required; discharge caps; strong enforcement), and regular monitoring occurs.

In general, no controls are necessary for effluent from Pacific oyster operations, as the oysters are biofilters and contribute to the control of excess nutrients in the water column. However, in the U.S. water quality is monitored by the National Shellfish Sanitation Program, and in the event of contamination from harmful algal blooms (such as red tides) or bacteria, growing areas are closed to harvest to protect public health (Downey, pers. comm., 2004).

In Washington State, where Sevin may be applied on oyster beds, its application is highly regulated and monitored by the Washington Department of Ecology (Johnson, 2001).

+0.25
Innovative methods and practices to reduce or recycle wastes are used (e.g., integrated systems; effluent and solid wastes used as terrestrial fertilizer); OR innovative methods and practices are not needed because raising this species does not create waste.

Farming this species does not create waste.

3.50
Points for Pollution

Risk to Other Species

Core Points (only one selection allowed)

Frequency and Impact of Escapes:

1.00
Farmed species regularly or intermittently escape into the wild AND escapes are non-native to the area or otherwise pose a risk to native populations or ecosystems (e.g., most non-native fish raised in outdoor facilities).
2.00
Escape frequency is not known OR farmed species is native to the area where it is raised and poses minimal risk to native populations or ecosystems (e.g., channel catfish in the US; most native mollusks).

Pacific Oysters are native to the western Pacific Ocean. They have been introduced and are well established in North America and many other areas of the world. While they are farmed in areas where they are non-native, such as the U.S. Pacific Northwest, oyster farming often aids in restoring the ecosystem functions of local oyster populations, which have often been depleted by disease and overharvesting (Matthiessen 2001; Conte 1996).

3.00
Farmed species never (or virtually never) escape to the wild (e.g., species is raised in bio-secure facilities).

Points of Adjustment (multiple selections allowed)

-0.25
This farmed species has been known to survive in the surrounding ecosystem if it escapes; OR would likely survive given its physiological requirements.

Pacific Oysters are farmed in the open water, so "escape" is common. This species is now well established in areas where it is not non-native, indicating that it does in fact survive in the surrounding ecosystem.

-0.25
This farmed species is known or is likely to compete with wild species for food or habitat if it escapes; OR this species is known or is likely to compromise the genetic integrity of the wild species (e.g., through spawning disruption, genetic introgression or establishment of feral stocks) if it escapes.

Olympia Oysters (Ostrea lurida) are the native oyster species in the Pacific Northwest, where Pacific Oysters are now farmed. In the mid to late 1800s, Olympia Oysters populations were decimated from overfishing and pollution. Farmers began to seed Pacific Oysters, and they quickly became the dominant oyster species in the region (Downey 2004; Matthiessen 2001). While Olympia Oyster populations remain below historical levels, their depletion was not a result of the introduction of the Pacific Oyster. In fact, restoration efforts for the Olympia Oyster are successful (Peabody, pers. comm., 2004), indicating that the presence of established Pacific Oyster populations is not inhibiting Olympia Oysters.

-0.25
This farmed species is known or is likely to amplify and transmit disease or parasites to wild populations (e.g., infectious salmon anemia or sea lice infestations) if it escapes.

Although Pacific Oysters are not farmed on the East Coast, people have tried seeding them there in the past. Some scientiest believe that Pacific Oysters were the carrier of the MSX disease that has devastated American Oyster populations on the U.S. East Coast. However, this remains speculation, and has not been proved. Therefore, we do not subtract points for this factor. Additionally, disease outbreaks of Pacific Oysters are well contained. One disease called Denman Disease does not effect other shellfish, and is considered a much bigger problem within wild populations than on farms (Downey, pers. comm. 2004).

-0.25
Regulatory authorities are not adequately addressing the risks of escape or spread of disease associated with farming this species.
+0.25
This farmed species has not been known to survive in the surrounding ecosystem if it escapes; OR would not likely survive given its physiological requirements; OR farmed species is a native mollusc.
+0.25
Operations employ management protocols and techniques to limit the ecological impacts of escaped farmed fish (e.g., triploidy; sterilization); OR it’s unlikely that escaped individuals will either compete with wild species for resources, or compromise the genetic integrity of wild species.
+0.25
Operations employ effective disease and parasite management protocols (e.g., fallowing of pens; retaining water when disease outbreak occurs); OR incidence of disease or risk of retransmitting disease is low.
+0.25
Regulatory authorities are addressing the risks of escape and spread of disease associated with farming this species.

Several agencies are addressing the risk of escape and disease. Each state in the U.S. has a department of health or agriculture to oversee the transfer of shellfish between states under The National Shellfish Sanitation Program (NSSP) (Kraeuter and Castagna 2001). Agencies responsible for natural resource management (e.g., Washington Department of Fish and Game) oversee the transfer of live animals intended for replanting (such as planting out seed from hatcheries to growing areas). Also, a health program (called the "High Health Program"), developed by the Pacific Shellfish Institute, provides stringent guidelines for hatcheries to assure disease-free seed is supplied to industry for grow-out. This program was adopted by USDA Animal Health Inspection Program, and has become a national model (Downey, pers. comm., 2004).

2.00
Points for Risk to Other Species

Ecological Effects

Core Points (only one selection allowed)

Ecological sensitivity of site used for operations:

1.00
Operations are generally located in areas of high ecological sensitivity (e.g., coastal wetlands; mangroves).
2.00
Operations are generally located in areas of moderate ecological sensitivity (e.g., coastal and nearshore waters; rocky intertidal or subtidal zones; river or stream shorelines).

Pacific oysters are generally grown in bays, inlets, and sounds, off-bottom, where they are afforded some degree of protection from waves and storm damage (Matthiessen 2001).

3.00
Operations are generally located in areas of low ecological sensitivity (e.g., land that is less susceptible to degradation such as land formerly used for agriculture or land previously developed).

Points of Adjustment (multiple selections allowed)

-0.25
Farming this species causes substantial damage to surrounding habitat, ecosystem or other resources (e.g., groundwater depletion; stream diversion; saltwater intrusion; soil salinization; loss of habitat for juvenile fish; loss of flood control; dredging hard bottoms; etc.).
-0.25
Harmful or lethal predator deterrents are used (e.g., bird/seal shootings; acoustic deterrent devices); OR operation otherwise harms wildlife (e.g., dolphin/seal entanglement; disrupting migration routes; bird/animal shooting).
-0.25
If seed is collected from wild sources, the intensity of collection is high enough to result in depletion of brood stock, wild juveniles, or associated non-target organisms (e.g., collection of postlarvae shrimp).
-0.25
Government policy encourages aquaculture operations to locate or expand in areas of high ecological sensitivity.
+0.25
Operations enhance habitat structure or function (e.g., constructed wetlands).

Like other bivalves, oysters enhance habitat function by improving water quality. Oysters filter out algae and other plankton, reducing levels of nitrogen, phosphorous and other nutrients (Downey, pers. comm., 2004). Pacific Oyster farms have encouraged the reestablishment of import eelgrass habitat, thereby enhancing habitat structure that is important for a range of species (Downey, pers. comm. 2004).

+0.25
Predator deterrents are not used OR predator deterrents are used but are not harmful or lethal (e.g., predator exclusion nets), AND operation does not otherwise harm wildlife.

Burrowing shrimps, Mud and Ghost Shrimps, have devastated areas that were previously oyster farms. Once these shrimp colonize an area, most other biota is eradicated, and the area is no longer suitable for aquaculture. To date, no methods have been found to be effective at removing these shrimps (Downey, pers. comm., 2004). Farms for Pacific Oysters are therefore only created in areas where these shrimp have not yet colonized (Peabody, pers. comm., 2004). Oyster drills are currently kept under control by manually removing them, and by prohibiting the transfer of anything from areas where oyster drills have been identified (Downey, pers. comm. 2004).

+0.25
Seed comes predominantly from hatcheries or on-farm sites (e.g., seed for trout); OR if seed is collected from the wild, it does not deplete brood stock, wild juveniles, or associated non-target organisms (e.g., collection of oyster or mussel spat).

From the 1920s to the 1970s, seed was imported from Japan, where operations are entirely dependent on wild populations for seed. Since then, almost all of the seed used in U.S. production has been hatchery-raised (Matthiessen 2001). Some scientists are concerned that the collection of wild seed in Japan could be harming wild populations, which are already suffering from coastal development (Matthiessen 2001). However, the U.S. market is not comprised of a significant amount of Japanese imports.

We add points here because most of the most of the Pacific Oysters in the U.S. market originated from hatchery-raised seed.

+0.25
Government policy encourages the growth of aquaculture operations in areas of low ecological sensitivity; OR protects sensitive habitats from aquaculture operations (e.g., prohibitions on cutting mangroves).
2.75
Points for Ecological Effects

References

Conte, Fred. 1996. California Oyster Culture. California Aquaculture. Department of Animal Science. University of California, Davis. ASAQ-A07: 2-96.

Downey, R., Executive Director, Pacific Coast Shellfish Growers Association. Personal Communication. 18 May 2004, and 27 September 2004.

Johnson, Art. Carbaryl Concentrations in Willapa Bay and Recommendations for Water Quality Guidelines. March 2001. Publication # 01-03-005. Available online at: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/pubs/0103005.pdf.

Kraeuter, J.N. and M. Castagna, Eds. Biology of the Hard Clam. Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science – 31. Elsevier. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Matthiessen, George C. Oyster Culture. Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science Ltd. Great Britain. 2001.

National Marine Fisheries Service. Fisheries Statistics & Economics Division. Trade Data. Available online at: http://www.st.nmfs.gov/st1/index.html. Accessed 23 September 2004.

Peabody, Betsy. Olympia Oyster Restoration Project. Personal Communication. September 27, 2004.

Pacific Coast Shellfish Growers Association. Shellfish Production on the West Coast. Projections for 2000. Available online at: http://pcsga.org/_documents/Production.html.

BLUE OCEAN INSTITUTE

34 Muttontown Lane, PO Box 250, East Norwich, NY 11732 • 1-877-BOI-SEAS • seafood@blueocean.org